Sunday, July 16, 2023

Arnold Bennett - How To Live on 24 Hours a Day

 Here is something from Arnold Bennett

Turns out, New Ageists have nothing on 19th century "thinkers" (alternatively known as "hack writers"), meaning, here we have Bennett promoting what he calls a technique for "controlling the mind" which is now sometimes termed "consciousness control" or more commonly "one-point meditation" or "awareness"

BEGINS

How to Live on Twenty-Four Hours a Day


by

Arnold Bennett




PREFACE TO THIS EDITION

This preface, though placed at the beginning, as a preface must be,
should be read at the end of the book.

I have received a large amount of correspondence concerning this small
work, and many reviews of it--some of them nearly as long as the book
itself--have been printed.  But scarcely any of the comment has been
adverse.  Some people have objected to a frivolity of tone; but as the
tone is not, in my opinion, at all frivolous, this objection did not
impress me; and had no weightier reproach been put forward I might
almost have been persuaded that the volume was flawless!  A more
serious stricture has, however, been offered--not in the press, but by
sundry obviously sincere correspondents--and I must deal with it.  A
reference to page 43 will show that I anticipated and feared this
disapprobation.  The sentence against which protests have been made is
as follows:--"In the majority of instances he [the typical man] does
not precisely feel a passion for his business; at best he does not
dislike it.  He begins his business functions with some reluctance, as
late as he can, and he ends them with joy, as early as he can. And his
engines, while he is engaged in his business, are seldom at their full
'h.p.'"

I am assured, in accents of unmistakable sincerity, that there are many
business men--not merely those in high positions or with fine
prospects, but modest subordinates with no hope of ever being much
better off--who do enjoy their business functions, who do not shirk
them, who do not arrive at the office as late as possible and depart as
early as possible, who, in a word, put the whole of their force into
their day's work and are genuinely fatigued at the end thereof.

I am ready to believe it.  I do believe it.  I know it.  I always knew
it.  Both in London and in the provinces it has been my lot to spend
long years in subordinate situations of business; and the fact did not
escape me that a certain proportion of my peers showed what amounted to
an honest passion for their duties, and that while engaged in those
duties they were really _living_ to the fullest extent of which they
were capable.  But I remain convinced that these fortunate and happy
individuals (happier perhaps than they guessed) did not and do not
constitute a majority, or anything like a majority.  I remain convinced
that the majority of decent average conscientious men of business (men
with aspirations and ideals) do not as a rule go home of a night
genuinely tired.  I remain convinced that they put not as much but as
little of themselves as they conscientiously can into the earning of a
livelihood, and that their vocation bores rather than interests them.

Nevertheless, I admit that the minority is of sufficient importance to
merit attention, and that I ought not to have ignored it so completely
as I did do.  The whole difficulty of the hard-working minority was put
in a single colloquial sentence by one of my correspondents.  He wrote:
"I am just as keen as anyone on doing something to 'exceed my
programme,' but allow me to tell you that when I get home at six thirty
p.m. I am not anything like so fresh as you seem to imagine."

Now I must point out that the case of the minority, who throw
themselves with passion and gusto into their daily business task, is
infinitely less deplorable than the case of the majority, who go
half-heartedly and feebly through their official day.  The former are
less in need of advice "how to live."  At any rate during their
official day of, say, eight hours they are really alive; their engines
are giving the full indicated "h.p."  The other eight working hours of
their day may be badly organised, or even frittered away; but it is
less disastrous to waste eight hours a day than sixteen hours a day; it
is better to have lived a bit than never to have lived at all. The real
tragedy is the tragedy of the man who is braced to effort neither in
the office nor out of it, and to this man this book is primarily
addressed.  "But," says the other and more fortunate man, "although my
ordinary programme is bigger than his, I want to exceed my programme
too!  I am living a bit; I want to live more. But I really can't do
another day's work on the top of my official day."

The fact is, I, the author, ought to have foreseen that I should appeal
most strongly to those who already had an interest in existence.  It is
always the man who has tasted life who demands more of it.  And it is
always the man who never gets out of bed who is the most difficult to
rouse.

Well, you of the minority, let us assume that the intensity of your
daily money-getting will not allow you to carry out quite all the
suggestions in the following pages.  Some of the suggestions may yet
stand.  I admit that you may not be able to use the time spent on the
journey home at night; but the suggestion for the journey to the office
in the morning is as practicable for you as for anybody. And that
weekly interval of forty hours, from Saturday to Monday, is yours just
as much as the other man's, though a slight accumulation of fatigue may
prevent you from employing the whole of your "h.p." upon it.  There
remains, then, the important portion of the three or more evenings a
week.  You tell me flatly that you are too tired to do anything outside
your programme at night.  In reply to which I tell you flatly that if
your ordinary day's work is thus exhausting, then the balance of your
life is wrong and must be adjusted.  A man's powers ought not to be
monopolised by his ordinary day's work. What, then, is to be done?

The obvious thing to do is to circumvent your ardour for your ordinary
day's work by a ruse. Employ your engines in something beyond the
programme before, and not after, you employ them on the programme
itself.  Briefly, get up earlier in the morning.  You say you cannot.
You say it is impossible for you to go earlier to bed of a night--to do
so would upset the entire household.  I do not think it is quite
impossible to go to bed earlier at night.  I think that if you persist
in rising earlier, and the consequence is insufficiency of sleep, you
will soon find a way of going to bed earlier.  But my impression is
that the consequences of rising earlier will not be an insufficiency of
sleep.  My impression, growing stronger every year, is that sleep is
partly a matter of habit--and of slackness.  I am convinced that most
people sleep as long as they do because they are at a loss for any
other diversion. How much sleep do you think is daily obtained by the
powerful healthy man who daily rattles up your street in charge of
Carter Patterson's van?  I have consulted a doctor on this point.  He
is a doctor who for twenty-four years has had a large general practice
in a large flourishing suburb of London, inhabited by exactly such
people as you and me.  He is a curt man, and his answer was curt:

"Most people sleep themselves stupid."

He went on to give his opinion that nine men out of ten would have
better health and more fun out of life if they spent less time in bed.

Other doctors have confirmed this judgment, which, of course, does not
apply to growing youths.

Rise an hour, an hour and a half, or even two hours earlier; and--if
you must--retire earlier when you can.  In the matter of exceeding
programmes, you will accomplish as much in one morning hour as in two
evening hours.  "But," you say, "I couldn't begin without some food,
and servants."  Surely, my dear sir, in an age when an excellent
spirit-lamp (including a saucepan) can be bought for less than a
shilling, you are not going to allow your highest welfare to depend
upon the precarious immediate co-operation of a fellow creature!
Instruct the fellow creature, whoever she may be, at night.  Tell her
to put a tray in a suitable position over night. On that tray two
biscuits, a cup and saucer, a box of matches and a spirit-lamp; on the
lamp, the saucepan; on the saucepan, the lid--but turned the wrong way
up; on the reversed lid, the small teapot, containing a minute quantity
of tea leaves.  You will then have to strike a match--that is all.  In
three minutes the water boils, and you pour it into the teapot (which
is already warm).  In three more minutes the tea is infused.  You can
begin your day while drinking it.  These details may seem trivial to
the foolish, but to the thoughtful they will not seem trivial.  The
proper, wise balancing of one's whole life may depend upon the
feasibility of a cup of tea at an unusual hour.

A. B.



CONTENTS

PREFACE

     I  THE DAILY MIRACLE
    II  THE DESIRE TO EXCEED ONE'S PROGRAMME
   III  PRECAUTIONS BEFORE BEGINNING
    IV  THE CAUSE OF THE TROUBLE
     V  TENNIS AND THE IMMORTAL SOUL
    VI  REMEMBER HUMAN NATURE
   VII  CONTROLLING THE MIND
  VIII  THE REFLECTIVE MOOD
    IX  INTEREST IN THE ARTS
     X  NOTHING IN LIFE IS HUMDRUM
    XI  SERIOUS READING
   XII  DANGERS TO AVOID


Friday, July 14, 2023

Le Grand Blond avec une chaussure noire (Pierre Richard & Debut De Soire...

Nice dress.

Floyd On Africa - Sun City & Drunk cocktail sequence.

Drunk cocktail

Rust Colored Beverage

 And now here's some Glenmorangie in the nature.

 

Rust coloration - perfect match


And the cask this Scottish piss matured in. Ha. Ha.

But then alcohol is the piss of Satan so calling it that is not far and wide off the mark. But tasty. Though not too much taste, an average cognac has more taste. But I am not knocking it, except down.





Friday, June 23, 2023

Alain de Botton - A good idea from... Baudelaire

 Food for thought aka quote of the day from Alain de Botton

 Alain de Botton - A good idea from... Baudelaire

 

FOR PEOPLE who think of city streets as nightmarish environments of noise and litter (and for whom happiness would be a cottage in the hills), Charles Baudelaire (1821-1867) may be the perfect guide to one particular charm of urban life.

In his prose and poetry of the 1850s and 60s, Baudelaire described walking down city streets as one of the most exciting adventures open to mankind; far more dramatic than any play, far richer in ideas than any book. And he settled on a word to capture the attitude he felt one should adopt when walking along the streets. One should become, he suggested, a flaneur, translated literally as a stroller or saunterer, though Baudelerians usually keep it in the original.

So what distinguishes flaneurs from ordinary people on their way to work? Perhaps their defining characteristic is that they don't have any practical goals in mind. Flaneurs aren't walking to get something, or to go somewhere; they aren't even shopping (which is as near as most of us get to this Baudelerian ideal). Flaneurs are standing in deliberate opposition to capitalist society, with its two great imperatives: to be in a hurry, and to buy things. (As a protest against the former, there was in Paris a brief vogue for flaneurs to amble around town with tortoises on leashes.)

What the flaneurs are doing is looking. They are opening their eyes and ears to the scene around them. They are not treating the street as an obstacle course to be negotiated; they are opening themselves up to it. They are wondering about the lives of those they pass, constructing narratives for them, they are eavesdropping on conversations, they are studying how people dress and what new shops and products there are (not in order to buy anything - just in order to reflect on them as important pieces of evidence of what human beings are about). The flaneurs are avid enthusiasts of what Baudelaire called "the modern". Unlike so many of Baudelaire's highbrow contemporaries, flaneurs aren't just interested in the beauty of classical objects of art, they relish what is up-to-date, they love the trendy.

While cities bring together huge numbers of people, paradoxically they also separate them from each other. The goal of flaneurs is to recover a sense of community, as Baudelaire put it, "to be away from home and yet to feel everywhere at home". To do this, they let down their guard, they empathise with situations they see. There's a constant risk they will be moved, saddened, excited - and fall in love.

Baudelaire's " une passante" in Les fleurs du mal is one of the finest poems on the mini-crushes one can - as a flaneur - have in city streets: a man walks past a beautiful woman in a crowded thoroughfare. He sees her for only a few seconds, she smiles at him, and he is filled with longing and a sense of what might have been. The poem ends with the sigh "O toi que j'eusse aimee": "you whom I might have loved".

How to become a flaneur: 1) Read Baudelaire's Spleen de Paris and his art criticism; 2) buy a turtle.

Unquote

So the idea is to stroll idly doing nothing, looking, feeling and experiencing in a hands-off way, while frustrating capitalism by i) refusing to work or otherwise contribute to Capitalist society, ii) refusing to spend in general and especially refusing to buy Capitalist goods....

But I seem to have a better idea... let's just develop the concept logically and bump ourselves off because that seems to be the only way you can escape the fate of a Capitalist slave to the 1% percent of Capitalist crooks.

Wednesday, June 21, 2023

Eating the Cannoli

 Here is your correspondent sat eating some Cannoli...

At some place here in Moscow




With Ricotta... tasty too.



... but not THE cannoli though



Fuller version






Monday, June 19, 2023

Morning Brut

 Here is some nice champagne by another name.




Mimosas, orange juice and champagne half and half.

Basically wasted all of the bottle on mimosas after the first couple glasses.

Me, if I drink champagne, I take a 0.75l bottle per meal only.



Friday, June 16, 2023

Fitness Atomic

This is what's on with me... Atomic Fitness by Steve Michalik... lots lots of reps... and it works... insanity! intensity! wooo hooo





Thursday, June 15, 2023

More Olde Necktimes

 Here is more old neckties from an antique shop here in Moscow.

These are old ties from 70s and 80s, and some are pretty wild too, even according to present standards but what they have in common is there is not a thread of silk lost amongst them.

Many are former Socialist camp, the legendary times of peace and happiness in Europe, which will never be repeated again (I mean Euro peace and happiness).






71st Nippon Derby, I think it took place in 2003, so not that long ago actually.





Sunday, June 11, 2023

Chuck Norris Jean

 Here's a blast from the past: Chuck Norris jeans, w hidden gusset for high kicks, were they any good?




Though am tired of jeans, prefer now nice classic woolen trousers, for summer with tropical wool, as they afford a much nicer feel to the hide than the courser denim, cooler too in summer, but warmer in winter.

Wednesday, May 17, 2023

Sunday's Walk May 14, 2023

Here is Sunday's walk about town, nothing particular to do, just gazing around, warm and sunny, about twentyish Celsius. 

Tulips are out in force, it's their time of year.

Red Army theater.

Vista on Moscow's Grand Mosque

Building.



Grand Mosque

First lunch

Fruit salad and coffee

Lots of coconut shavings.

Finished it, there was no soup de jour though.


Chestnut in bloom too.


Back to the theater.





Fit For King

Fit for a king as in fit to be a king...the last king of Ingerland


 

 

Sunday, May 14, 2023

Fan M65 Lookbook

 Here is my fan M65 (and derivative) jacket lookbook.

I own two myself, modern renditions, one black and one olive green and am going to post pics but most images are not mine, pulled from the Internet, kudos to their owners whoever they are.

Also, I am interested in m65 worn avec classic menswear.


 

 

My preference is to wear them oversized for winter which allows lots of layering in the winter in addition to the liner, and a size smaller for summer sens the liner.

In CM context, above Bruce G. Boyer, below a little bit of rest



 

Gaspar Noe, though he thinks too much of himself and his movies; that Hollywood is mostly crap doesn't mean that his movies are automatically much better, although they could be but not automatically.


Another overrated filmmaker below but maybe not anymore; thinks his fortunes are declining even in Horriblewood



 


I guess obl has to be included as a notorious wearer of M65s, though I personally don't like camo'd M65s, certainly not in woodland camo.

Simon Crompton, a British menswear dude, he replied to me once on Insta, so Muchos Lovos, though looks too short for him.







My preference, as I said above, is for an oversized M65 fit, however on others true-to-size or even smaller also seems to work.


Below, said to be something called M75


ra I guess



Yours truly

Forgive me, but there is something unclean about the one below, still a good outfit.


 

 

From a Finnish movie, though am not a fan of this type of M65 styling


"Baby killers"








More baby killers.